recognised leaders in the development of the law of negligence

Our cases

Heaney & Partners appear before various statutory tribunals, disciplinary bodies - as well as all courts.

 

 

Latest

February 28 2024
SO BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN V DRUMM & WILLIAMS (HC)

The High Court rejected an application by a supporter of several students to be their ‘litigation guardian’ in this High Court decision.

December 19 2023
CULLEN V PA'U & ANOR (HC)

We successfully acted for the School Board in a case where the High Court upheld the school's decision to issue a trespass notice against a supporter of a student. 

October 20 2023
RAUE V HARCOURTS HAMILL REALITY & ANOR (CA)

We acted for Hamill Realty Ltd in successfully defending an application by the Appellant, Ms Raue, through which she sought to file her case on appeal out of time.

March 28 2023
DETAILS SUPPRESSED (REA)

We acted for a real estate agency and its sales agent in this disciplinary investigation by the Real Estate Authorities’ Complaints Assessment Committee.

October 31 2022
ROCK AND RUBBLE LTD V OWERS (DC)

Artem was junior counsel in a successful summary judgment brought against a debtor to enforce a personal guarantee.

May 18 2022
RAUE V HARCOURTS HAMILL LTD & ANOR (HC)

We successfully defended an application for leave to appeal a decision of the District Court, brought out of time, by a tenant of a property that our client managed.

March 11 2022
Complaint number 41618 [Details suppressed] (REA)

We successfully defended our real estate agency and sales agent clients against a complaint made against them to the REA. The Complaints Assessment Committee decided to take no further action.

July 15 2021
FORD V BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR SMITH PRIMARY SCHOOL (CA)

Paul acted for the school board in this case where the Court had to determine whether the school could withdraw offers of places to students from out of zone if there were no places for them.

July 15 2020
BODY CORPORATE 378351 V AUCKLAND COUNCIL (HC)

We succeeded in having 14 defects, not part of the original WHRS assessor’s report, struck out.